DNS & Jargon

Yes it is used in athletics. This is where acronyms can be confusing, but if someone like Alex for example, includes it in a message to a IT collegue I'm sure the meaning would be plain. However, when an acronym is used in the same field ......?

I have a medical condition known as M.H. which can be fatal. It is an acronym for Malignant Hyperpyrexia, commonly referred to as 'malignant hyperthermia under anaesthesia'. However, I was alarmed to see M.H. used in a magazine for migraine headache. I'm afraid a couple of asprins would not be of any use to me if I mentioned to a medic that I had M.H.!

 

Ok, as I seem to have started quite a discussion on this subject may I suggest an answer that may help, if not please everyone. If one writes, say " I had a look in the records at Online Parish Clerks and found the answer. I think OPC is an wonderful site." So in full with bold first letters, then if mentioned again, as an abbreviation. Just a suggestion.

 

Thanks Alexander

 

I have mentioned about how my Computer Magazine provides a 'Jargon Buster' section but what I should also have added is that when an acronym (or a similar short-form) is used in the print version (there is an online one) it is shown in red. This tells the reader unfamiliar with the term that it can be looked up on the inside of the back page. Web addresses are set out in full in blue print and may be copied into the address box within your browser if you wish to check it out.

In the online version passing the mouse over the red item displays the word in full (ie DNS =Domain Name Server) and clicking on it takes you to its Jargon Buster explanation. Of course web addresses -shown in blue -are direct links taking you to the web page just as in this Forum.

Is it possible on a Forum page for code to be written so that when an acronym is written in a (pre-decided) format -similar perhaps to that used for links- its full name is displayed when a mouse hovers over? (As happens with toolbar items). It would be nice if clicking on it could then provide an explanation, but in most cases just knowing what the acronym stands will suffice.

 

A good idea if it were possible but it would then become onerous to make a posting, so I think best left to the Board Moderator to decide and implement where there appears to be a problem.

 

I think the situation/problem occurs when the person writing doesn't realise that they are not being understood. I think we would all grasp that if we were using an unusual word we would have to explain it, and similarly with an unusual acronym or set of initials. However, there are cases where what seems 'obvious' to us is not to our audience. (I recall saying something to an experienced dinghy sailor that included the terms 'pintle' and 'gudgeon' and he looked at me and said 'I have no idea what you are talking about'. I wouldn't have expected Joe Public to understand but I thought he would). Thus, it should not be left to the poster decide what and when to explain, as they are probably not the best judge. Perhaps we need a 'no blame, no shame' policy allowing readers to query what the term means?